SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Cynthia Floyd

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Long Beach Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 20,275 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Floyd?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Floyd has issued 20,275 lifetime decisions, providing a dataset for understanding her approach to disability claims. In the most recent reporting period, her 65% approval rate sits 3 points above the Long Beach office average of 52%, though it remains 3 points below the national average of 58%. These figures offer a window into historical trends rather than a guarantee of your future outcome.

Metric Judge Floyd Long Beach National
Approval rate 55% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 55%
Denials 35%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Floyd's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Floyd
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a decade on the bench, Judge Floyd has seen her approval rates fluctuate. Her career began with a 40% approval rate in 2016, followed by a shift toward higher allowance rates mid-tenure. The most recent data indicates a 65% approval rate in 2025, suggesting a continuation of a more favorable trend compared to her earlier years. This pattern reflects a judge whose decision-making has evolved over time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Floyd's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Floyd? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Long Beach hearing office

The Long Beach Hearing Office serves a large population of claimants throughout Southern California. With a bench of 6 judges, the office manages a high volume of cases, maintaining an office-wide latest approval rate of 52%. You can expect a formal hearing process where the focus remains on your medical documentation and vocational evidence.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Floyd is essentially random. Across the Long Beach office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 ALJs range from 29% to 72%, reflecting the diversity of perspectives on the bench. Regardless of which judge is assigned to your case, the fundamental requirements for proving your disability remain consistent.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions