SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Edward C. Graham

Last decided Long BeachSep 2021
Decisions 2,126since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same period to ensure accuracy. The 60% approval rate for Edward C. Graham covers all decisions on record since 2016, which compares to the 32% to 76% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Long Beach hearing office. This broad range highlights how much the specific judge assigned to your case can influence the outcome. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 2,126

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Graham. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Graham's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Graham
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Edward C. Graham has remained relatively steady across the 2,126 decisions on record since 2016. While annual figures fluctuated between 56% and 62% for most of the period, the data shows a consistent approach to evaluating your disability claim. The final partial year of data in 2021 showed a 71% approval rate, though this was based on a smaller volume of 24 decisions. This trend suggests a stable decision-making pattern over the course of the recorded window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Graham's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Long Beach hearing office

The Long Beach hearing office serves you if you are in the California region. This office features a bench of 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. You can see the Long Beach Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Long Beach

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the Long Beach hearing office. Because approval rates across this bench vary from 32% to 76%, your assigned judge is a meaningful factor in your hearing process. For preparation purposes, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions