SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. John C. Tobin

Last decided Long BeachSep 2024
Decisions 1,669since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 71% approval rate for John C. Tobin reflects his total decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 32% to 76% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Long Beach office. This statistical range provides context for how different judges have historically approached cases at this location.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 71%
Decisions on record 1,669

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Tobin. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2024. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Tobin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Tobin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY23
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

John C. Tobin's approval rate has shown variation since 2016, with a peak of 77% in 2018 and 2020 before shifting to 61% in 2021. The record includes 1,669 decisions, showing a steady volume of activity through 2023. While the rate fluctuated in recent years, the overall pattern remains consistent with a high-volume docket. These shifts often reflect changes in the specific types of medical evidence presented or evolving case mixes rather than a change in judicial philosophy.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Tobin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Long Beach hearing office

The Long Beach hearing office serves you if you are in the California region. This office has a bench of 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on the medical evidence provided in your file. For more information, see the Long Beach Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Long Beach

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the Long Beach office. Approval rates among these peers range from 32% to 76% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions