SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Deborah Foresman

Last decided RichmondSep 2022
Decisions 1,859since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same data windows to ensure accuracy. The 42% approval rate for Deborah Foresman is based on 1,859 decisions on record since 2016. This figure sits within the 18% to 59% range observed among the 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Richmond hearing office. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than individual case outcomes.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 1,859

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Foresman. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2022. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Foresman's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Foresman
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Deborah Foresman shows variation across the 1,859 decisions on record since 2016. After maintaining rates near 49% in 2019, the data shows a decline in the following years, with the rate reaching 34% by 2022. These fluctuations are common in administrative dockets and often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Foresman's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Richmond hearing office

Deborah Foresman's most recent office on record is the Richmond hearing office. This office hosts a bench of 13 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Richmond

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Richmond hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 18% to 59% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions