SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Deborah Foresman

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 1,859 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Deborah Foresman is based on 1,859 lifetime decisions, providing a clear view of her historical record since 2016. This figure sits within the broader range of 18% to 59% observed across the Richmond hearing office bench. Comparing these lifetime figures helps you understand the local judicial landscape, though every case remains unique.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 1,859

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Foresman. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2022. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Foresman's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Foresman
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Deborah Foresman has shifted over the years. Starting from 49% in 2016, the rate fluctuated before reaching 34% in 2022. With 1,859 total decisions on record, these shifts highlight how case mix or evolving evidence standards can influence outcomes. The recent period reflects a departure from the higher approval rates seen earlier in the record window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Foresman's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Richmond hearing office

The Richmond hearing office serves you throughout Virginia, operating as a critical hub for regional disability determinations. The office maintains a diverse bench of 13 judges on record, reflecting a wide spectrum of decision patterns. You can expect a formal hearing process where evidence quality is the primary driver of the outcome. You can see the Richmond hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 13 judges on record at this office since 2016, with lifetime approval rates ranging from 18% to 59%. Because of this variance, understanding the office environment is helpful.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions