SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Gary A. Freyberg

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Madison Hearing Office · 9 years on the bench · 15,238 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Freyberg?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Gary A. Freyberg is based on 15,238 lifetime decisions rendered over your 9-year tenure. During the most recent reporting period, you maintained an approval rate of 58%, matching the national average of 58% while trailing the local Madison office average of 69%. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how cases have been resolved in your courtroom.

Metric Judge Freyberg Madison National
Approval rate 58% 69% 58%
Fully favorable 50%
Denials 42%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Freyberg's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Freyberg
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over your 9 years on the bench, your annual approval rates have fluctuated, moving from a high of 66% in 2018 and 2023 to a low of 49% in 2019. Your recent performance shows a steady trend, with the latest period approval rate of 58% remaining consistent with your lifetime average. This pattern suggests a stable approach to evaluating evidence and testimony.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Freyberg's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Freyberg? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Madison hearing office

The Madison Hearing Office serves claimants across Wisconsin, managing a high volume of cases with a bench of 6 ALJs. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 69%, reflecting the local environment for disability adjudication. You can expect a formal process focused on the specific medical documentation provided in your file.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Madison Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 49% to 78%. Because you cannot choose your judge, you should focus on the strength of your medical evidence and the clarity of your testimony.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions