SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Gary A. Freyberg

Last decided MadisonJul 2026
Decisions 2,431since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. Gary A. Freyberg has a 59% approval rate across 2,431 decisions on record since 2017, which sits within the 50% to 78% range observed among his peers at the Madison office. In the most recent reporting period, he maintained a 76% approval rate, which is 7 points higher than the office average of 69%. These figures reflect historical trends rather than specific outcomes for your upcoming hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 59%
Decisions on record 2,431
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Freyberg Madison National
Approval rate 76% 69% 58%
Fully favorable 69% — —
Denials 24% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Freyberg's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Freyberg
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The 2,431 decisions on record for Gary A. Freyberg since 2017 show a fluctuating pattern of approval. After a period of variance between 2018 and 2025, the most recent data indicates a 76% approval rate for the 54 decisions recorded in the current partial fiscal year. This recent figure represents a shift compared to his long-term average, reflecting changes in case volume or specific evidence requirements.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Freyberg's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Madison hearing office

The most recent office on record for Gary A. Freyberg is the Madison hearing office, with data current through July 2026. This office serves claimants across Wisconsin and is part of a regional network of SSA hearing sites. With a bench of 8 judges and an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 69%, the Madison office handles a significant volume of disability claims.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Madison

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is random. There are 8 judges whose most recent office on record is the Madison office, and 5 of them decided cases in the latest SSA file from July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary, ranging from 50% to 78% on their records since 2016. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions