SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Barry O'Melinn

On record 3,538 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent data periods. Barry O'Melinn maintains a 47% lifetime approval rate, which sits within the 41% to 89% range of all judges who have served at the Albuquerque hearing office. In the most recent reporting period, his approval rate was 47%, compared to the office-wide rate of 49%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 47%
Decisions on record 3,538
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge O'Melinn Albuquerque National
Approval rate 47% 49% 58%
Fully favorable 42%
Denials 53%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge O'Melinn's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge O'Melinn
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Barry O'Melinn has issued 3,538 decisions. His approval rate has shown a varied trend, moving from 53% in 2016 to 46% in 2026. This fluctuation is common in SSDI hearings as case mixes and evidence standards evolve. The latest period reflects a continuation of this pattern, suggesting that the judge's approach remains consistent with his long-term record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge O'Melinn's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Albuquerque hearing office

The Albuquerque hearing office serves you throughout New Mexico. With 16 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 49%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Albuquerque Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. There are 16 judges on record at the Albuquerque hearing office, 7 of whom reported data in the latest period. With lifetime approval rates across the office ranging from 41% to 89%, the judge you are assigned can be a significant factor in your hearing process. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions