SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Ollie Garmon

On record 866 decisions since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Ollie Garmon is based on 866 lifetime decisions recorded between 2017 and 2021. When evaluating this figure, consider the broader context of the Atlanta North hearing office, where judges' lifetime approval rates span from 24% to 94%. These statistics provide a baseline for understanding how your case may be viewed. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 94%
Decisions on record 866

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Garmon. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Garmon's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Garmon
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Ollie Garmon shows a consistent pattern of activity across the 2017 to 2021 window. After an initial period, the judge maintained a high approval rate, peaking at 96% in 2019 before settling at 89% in the final year of the data set. This trend suggests a stable approach to evaluating your disability claim over the course of the 866 lifetime decisions on record. The recent data reflects a continuation of this established decision-making pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Garmon's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Atlanta North hearing office

The Atlanta North hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout the region, operating as a key hub for Social Security disability hearings in Georgia. With a bench of 24 judges on record, the office manages a diverse caseload that reflects the broader national standards for disability adjudication. You can expect a formal process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Atlanta North Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Atlanta North hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your specific judge is determined randomly. There are 24 judges on record at this office since 2016, with 6 currently reporting in the latest SSA data. Because approval rates across this bench vary significantly—ranging from 24% to 94%—understanding the office environment is useful. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions