SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Tammy Georgian

Last decided Charleston SCJul 2026
Decisions 2,616since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. While your judge's 17% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a long-term view, recent performance shows a 14% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest figure sits 34 points below the Charleston SC office average of 48%. These statistics are derived from a significant volume of decisions, providing a stable basis for analysis. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 17%
Decisions on record 2,616
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Georgian Charleston SC National
Approval rate 14% 48% 58%
Fully favorable 12% — —
Denials 86% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Georgian's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Georgian
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Your approval rate for Tammy Georgian has fluctuated across the 2,616 decisions on record since 2016. After seeing rates as high as 22% in 2022 and 2023, the most recent data shows a rate of 14% for the partial 2026 fiscal year. This recent trend represents a shift from the performance seen in previous years. The latest period reflects a departure from the historical average, which may be influenced by changes in the types of cases heard or the specific medical evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Georgian's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Charleston SC hearing office

The Charleston SC office serves you and other claimants across South Carolina. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, reflecting a diverse bench with varying approval patterns. In the latest reporting period, the office maintained an approval rate of 48%. You can expect a formal hearing process where evidence quality is the primary factor in your outcome. See the Charleston SC Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Charleston SC

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Charleston SC office, there are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 17% to 87% since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions