SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Tammy Georgian

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,616 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. While Tammy Georgian maintains a 17% lifetime approval rate, her latest-period approval rate of 14% sits 34 points below the Charleston SC office average of 48%. These figures are derived from a significant docket of 2,616 lifetime decisions, providing a stable view of past activity. These metrics reflect historical trends rather than a fixed outcome for your hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 17%
Decisions on record 2,616
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Georgian Charleston SC National
Approval rate 14% 48% 58%
Fully favorable 12%
Denials 86%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Georgian's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Georgian
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Tammy Georgian's approval rate has fluctuated, showing a peak of 22% in 2022 and 2023 before settling to 14% in the most recent reporting period. This pattern reflects a consistent approach to evidence evaluation over her 2,616 lifetime decisions. The recent decline in the approval rate suggests a trend where strict adherence to documentation is prioritized. These shifts often mirror changes in the complexity of cases assigned to the bench.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Georgian's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Charleston SC hearing office

The Charleston SC hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, operating as a hub for disability adjudication. With a bench of 15 judges on record and a latest-period office-wide approval rate of 48%, this office manages a high volume of claims. You can expect a formal process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Charleston SC Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. At the Charleston SC office, there are 15 judges on record since 2016, with 5 currently reporting activity. The lifetime approval rates across this bench range from 17% to 87%, highlighting the variance you may encounter. This range provides a broader context for the office's adjudication environment.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions