SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Eric L. Glazer

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 630 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for a judge is a probability cloud derived from their historical record, providing context for what to expect at your hearing. At the Buffalo office, the lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 28% to 89%. These figures are based on 630 lifetime decisions on record since 2016. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 67%
Decisions on record 630

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Glazer. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Glazer's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Glazer
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Eric L. Glazer's record shows a consistent pattern of approvals across the 630 decisions documented since 2016. The yearly trend indicates a peak in 2017 with a 71% approval rate, following a 65% rate in 2016, before adjusting to 58% in 2018. This fluctuation reflects the inherent variability in disability case evidence and the specific requirements of each claim.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Glazer's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Buffalo hearing office

The Buffalo hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, operating as a critical hub for disability adjudications in New York. The office maintains a bench of 18 judges on record since 2016, ensuring a diverse range of judicial perspectives. You can expect a formal process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. See the Buffalo Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 18 judges on record at this office since 2016. Because approval rates across the office bench range from 28% to 89%, understanding the broader office environment is useful. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions