SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Tamia N. Gordon

Last decided New OrleansSep 2018
Decisions 987since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

This table compares the approval rate of Tamia N. Gordon against the broader bench at the New Orleans hearing office. We look at the 987 decisions on record since 2016 to provide a stable view of past performance. These figures are compared against the 38% to 85% approval range observed among the 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 48%
Decisions on record 987

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Gordon. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Gordon's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Gordon
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Tamia N. Gordon has issued 987 decisions on record since 2016. Your data shows a shift in approval patterns, starting at 58% in 2016, declining to 42% in 2017, and moving to 49% in 2018. This trend highlights the importance of presenting a complete medical record, as the approval rate has fluctuated over the observed period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Gordon's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the New Orleans hearing office

Tamia N. Gordon's most recent office on record is the New Orleans hearing office, with decisions there through September 2018. This office maintains a bench of 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. You can expect a standard hearing process where the focus remains on your medical documentation and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is New Orleans

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with approval rates ranging from 38% to 85%. While these figures provide context for the office, they do not dictate the outcome of your specific hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions