SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Thomas Grabeel

Last decided New YorkSep 2018
Decisions 1,031since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Thomas Grabeel is based on 1,031 decisions made between 2016 and 2018. This record is compared against the performance of other judges at the same office who have active records in the most recent SSA data. These figures provide a statistical overview of past activity at the New York Hearing Office. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 79%
Decisions on record 1,031

Judge Grabeel is not in SSA's latest disposition file, so there is no 12-month figure. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Judge Grabeel isn't in SSA's latest disposition file, so the judge comparison tool, which compares active judges over the same 12 months, leaves them out.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Grabeel's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Grabeel
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Thomas Grabeel's approval rate on record since 2016 shows an upward trend across the available data. In 2016, the approval rate was 76% over 498 decisions, rising to 78% in 2017, and reaching 83% in 2018. This pattern reflects activity across the 1,031 total decisions on record through September 2018.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Grabeel's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the New York hearing office

The New York Hearing Office serves you across the region. This office maintains a bench of 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process where your evidence and testimony are reviewed. See the New York Hearing Office page for the full roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is New York

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the New York Hearing Office, there are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 5 of them having decided cases in SSA's latest file. These 5 judges range from 41% to 81% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions