SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Rhonda S. Greenberg

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Tampa Hearing Office · 3 years on the bench · 2,777 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Greenberg?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Greenberg maintains a lifetime approval rate of 57%, which is closely aligned with the 58% national average and the 58% Tampa office average. This statistical baseline is derived from 2,777 lifetime decisions made during her 3-year tenure. Comparing these figures helps you understand the environment of your upcoming hearing. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Greenberg Tampa National
Approval rate 57% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 48%
Denials 43%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Greenberg's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Greenberg
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 3 years on the bench, Judge Greenberg has shown a variable decision pattern. Her approval rate fluctuated from 49% in 2016 to a peak of 68% in 2017, before adjusting to 33% in the most recent reporting period. These shifts often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the specific evidence presented during those years. This trend highlights the importance of presenting a robust medical record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Greenberg's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Greenberg? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tampa hearing office

The Tampa Hearing Office serves a large population across the region, managing a high volume of disability claims with a bench of 6 judges. The office maintains an approval rate of 58%, consistent with national trends for Social Security Disability Insurance. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. See the Tampa Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to Judge Greenberg is essentially random. Within the Tampa Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 48% to 70%. This variance underscores why you should focus on the strength of your own medical evidence rather than the specific judge assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions