SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Steven D. Slahta

On record 3,529 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The following table compares Steven D. Slahta's performance against broader benchmarks to provide context for your hearing. We look at his 70% lifetime approval rate alongside the 38% to 70% lifetime range observed among all judges at the Fort Myers FL office. Latest-period data shows how his recent decisions compare to office, state, and national averages. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 70%
Decisions on record 3,529
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Slahta Fort Myers FL National
Approval rate 40% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 40%
Denials 60%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Slahta's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Slahta
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Steven D. Slahta has maintained a consistent record, with annual approval rates generally fluctuating between 61% and 77% for most of his tenure. While the most recent period shows a lower approval rate of 40%, this is based on a small sample of only 6 decisions. His long-term pattern suggests a judge who has historically evaluated a high volume of cases with a steady approach. The recent shift may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality rather than a fundamental change in judicial philosophy.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Slahta's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fort Myers FL hearing office

The Fort Myers FL hearing office serves claimants across the region, functioning as a critical hub for SSDI hearings in Florida. The office bench consists of 7 judges who manage a diverse caseload of disability claims. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 66%, you should focus on building a robust medical record to support your application. See the Fort Myers FL Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Fort Myers FL hearing office currently has 7 judges on record since 2016, with 5 judges reporting activity in the latest SSA data. Because the SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, you cannot choose your judge, and the assignment is effectively random. Approval rates across this office's bench range from 38% to 70% over their respective lifetimes. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions