SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Carl C. McGhee

On record 3,680 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. While Carl C. McGhee has a lifetime approval rate of 66%, his latest-period rate is 72%, which sits 13 percentage points above the Tampa OHO latest-period average of 59%. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a reliable look at his decision history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 66%
Decisions on record 3,680
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge McGhee Tampa OHO National
Approval rate 72% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 66%
Denials 28%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McGhee's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McGhee
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval trend for Carl C. McGhee has shown movement, including a recent period of higher approval rates compared to his earlier years on record. With 3,680 total decisions, the data reveals a judge who has navigated various shifts in case volume and outcomes. The latest period reflects a continuation of this pattern, with the judge currently approving 72% of cases. This recent uptick may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McGhee's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tampa OHO hearing office

The Tampa OHO serves claimants across the region, functioning as a hub for disability hearings in Florida. With 16 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 59%. You can expect a formal hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. You can see the Tampa OHO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, 11 of whom reported in the SSA's latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 31% to 90% over their respective lifetime records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions