SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Carl C. McGhee

Last decided Tampa OHOJul 2026
Decisions 3,680since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates provides context on how a judge's decisions align with broader trends. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Carl C. McGhee's 73% approval rate is measured against the Tampa OHO (58%), Florida (59%), and national (58%) averages. These figures rely on 356 decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge McGhee Tampa OHO National
Approval rate 73% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 66% — —
Denials 27% — —
Decisions 356 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 66%
Decisions on record 3,680

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McGhee's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McGhee
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Carl C. McGhee has issued 3,680 decisions, maintaining an overall approval rate of 66%. The yearly trend shows fluctuations, with approval rates moving from 64% in 2016 to 73% in the most recent partial fiscal year. While the rate dipped to 55% in 2021, the most recent 12 months sit above the record since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McGhee's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tampa OHO hearing office

The Tampa OHO serves claimants across Florida and is part of a regional network of hearing offices. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 11 of them having decided cases in SSA's latest file through July 2026. The office recorded a 58% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tampa OHO

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 11 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file, approval rates range from 36% to 73% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, 11 of whom decided cases here in SSA's latest file. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge McGhee's 73%. All five last decided cases in Florida.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge McGhee and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions