SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Frank L. Gregori

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,650 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for this judge are based on 2,650 lifetime decisions recorded since 2016. When evaluating these figures, note that the Nashville hearing office bench features a wide range of lifetime approval rates, spanning from 47% to 75%. These statistics reflect historical patterns rather than individual hearing outcomes, and aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predictions for your hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 61%
Decisions on record 2,650

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Gregori. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2024. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Gregori's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Gregori
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY24
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your judge's decision pattern has shown a steady trajectory with recent variation. After hovering near the 60% mark for several years, the data indicates a shift in the most recent period, with approval rates reaching 71% in 2024. This trend may reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of evidence presented, and understanding these fluctuations helps you prepare a comprehensive case strategy.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Gregori's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Nashville hearing office

The Nashville hearing office serves claimants across Tennessee and the surrounding region. As part of the Social Security Administration hearing network, this office manages a diverse caseload with a bench of 11 judges on record. You can expect a formal process focused on medical and vocational evidence. You can visit the Nashville hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 11 judges on record at this office since 2016, 4 of whom are reported in the latest SSA period. With lifetime approval rates across the bench ranging from 47% to 75%, the specific judge assigned can influence the hearing environment, though your preparation remains consistent regardless of the assignment.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions