SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Odell Grooms

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 854 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Odell Grooms reflects a substantial body of work spanning nearly a decade of hearings. When evaluating this figure, it is helpful to consider the broader context of the Sacramento hearing office, where lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 39% to 80%. This variance highlights why the specific judge assigned to your case is a meaningful factor in the hearing process. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 65%
Decisions on record 854

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Grooms. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Grooms's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Grooms
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the record for Odell Grooms shows a varied approval pattern that has shifted over time. While the early years of the data window saw approval rates consistently in the 60% range, more recent periods have shown increased volatility. Understanding this pattern helps you see that the judge's approach is not static, and the latest period reflects a departure from the long-term average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Grooms's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Sacramento hearing office

The Sacramento hearing office serves a wide region in California, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 20 judges on record, the office handles a diverse caseload that requires careful preparation of medical and vocational evidence. You can expect a formal proceeding where the focus remains on the specific documentation of your impairment. You can see the Sacramento Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Sacramento hearing office is staffed by a diverse group of jurists, with 20 judges on record since 2016, 6 of whom are reported in the latest SSA data. Because the SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, you cannot request a specific judge, and your assignment is effectively random. Approval rates across this office vary significantly, spanning from 39% to 80% on a lifetime basis. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions