Nikki Hall is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Morgantown Hearing Office. Over 6 years on the bench and 11,191 lifetime decisions, 21% have been approved. This rate is 37 points below the office average. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing a judge's lifetime performance against current office and national benchmarks provides helpful context for your hearing. Judge Hall has maintained a 21% lifetime approval rate across 11,191 lifetime decisions, which sits below the current 58% office average and 58% national average. This data reflects a significant volume of cases, offering a stable view of past judicial activity.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hall's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over 6 years on the bench, your judge's approval rate has trended from 34% in 2016 to 12% in 2021. This pattern reflects a consistent approach to case evaluation throughout their tenure. While the latest period shows a lower approval frequency compared to earlier years, such shifts often relate to changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of evidence presented.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hall's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Hall? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Check My BenefitsAbout the Morgantown hearing office
The Morgantown Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across West Virginia and surrounding areas. This office manages a high volume of cases with a bench of 6 judges, maintaining an office-wide latest approval rate of 58%. You can expect a formal hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can visit the Morgantown Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Morgantown Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 21% to 66%. Because each judge has a unique approach to evaluating evidence, understanding the office-wide environment is useful for your preparation.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
