SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Linda S. Halperin

Last decided EvanstonSep 2018
Decisions 605since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Linda S. Halperin's 79% approval rate on record since 2016 reflects her history within the Evanston office's bench, which ranges from 45% to 79% for judges with similar records. These figures rely on 605 decisions to provide a statistical picture. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 79%
Decisions on record 605

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Halperin. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Halperin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Halperin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Linda S. Halperin showed variation across the 605 decisions on record since 2016. The data indicates an approval rate of 78% in 2016, 84% in 2017, and 65% in 2018. This trend highlights how approval patterns fluctuate year over year based on the evidence presented in each case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Halperin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Evanston hearing office

The Evanston hearing office is the most recent office on record for Linda S. Halperin, as of September 2018. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of medical evidence is the primary factor in your decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Evanston

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the Evanston office, with approval rates ranging from 45% to 79% on their since-2016 records. Because each judge has a unique approach to evaluating evidence, understanding the broader office bench is helpful.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions