SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Laura Speck Havens

Last decided SacramentoJul 2026
Decisions 7since 2026

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same time period. Between October 1, 2025 and July 31, 2026, Laura Speck Havens decided 7 cases with a 57% approval rate, while the Sacramento office averaged 68% over that same window. These figures provide a statistical snapshot of recent activity at the office.

Last 12 months October 1, 2025 – July 31, 2026 · record starts this fiscal year
Metric Judge Havens Sacramento National
Approval rate 57% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 57% — —
Denials 43% — —
Decisions 7 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2026
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 7

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Judge Havens made fewer than 100 decisions in the last 12 months, too few for a fair side-by-side, so the judge comparison tool leaves them out.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Havens's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Havens
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Laura Speck Havens has 7 decisions on record since 2026. This record reflects activity during the current fiscal year, with an approval rate of 57% for this period. This rate is consistent with the total activity since 2026, as the most recent window captures the entirety of the available record in the latest SSA file.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Havens's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Sacramento hearing office

Laura Speck Havens's most recent office on record is the Sacramento office. This office has a bench of 20 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process where the focus remains on the medical and vocational evidence you present.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Sacramento

The Social Security Administration assigns cases randomly. Approval rates vary across the bench, with the 6 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file ranging from 55% to 80% over the period between October 1, 2025 and July 31, 2026. There are 20 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 6 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions