SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Maria Herrero-Jaarsma

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Buffalo Hearing Office · 4 years on the bench · 3,254 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Herrero-Jaarsma?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Herrero-Jaarsma maintains a 54% lifetime approval rate, which sits 1% above the Buffalo Hearing Office average and 4% below the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from 3,254 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Herrero-Jaarsma Buffalo National
Approval rate 54% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 46%
Denials 46%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Herrero-Jaarsma's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Herrero-Jaarsma
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 4 years on the bench, the approval pattern for Judge Herrero-Jaarsma has shifted. After an initial period in 2017 with a 72% approval rate, the volume of cases increased in 2018, resulting in a 53% rate. By 2019, the rate adjusted to 44%. These fluctuations are common and often relate to changes in the complexity of cases or the evidence presented during your hearing process.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Herrero-Jaarsma's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Herrero-Jaarsma? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Buffalo hearing office

The Buffalo Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Western New York, managing a high volume of disability appeals. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 53%. You can see the Buffalo Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Buffalo Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 ALJs range from 46% to 54%. While these variations exist, the fundamental requirements for proving your disability remain consistent across all courtrooms.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions