Virginia Herring's most recent office on record is the Oak Park hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 3,861 decisions on record since January 2016, 51% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 36% to 83% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your specific case.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure a fair assessment. While Virginia Herring has a 51% approval rate since 2016, the latest-period data shows a 51% rate, which sits 15 points below the Oak Park office average of 66%. These figures are derived from a significant volume of 3,861 decisions on record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Herring's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval rate for Virginia Herring has fluctuated since 2016. After starting at 41% in 2016, the rate reached a high of 62% in 2024 before settling at 51% in the most recent partial year of 2026. With 3,861 total decisions on record, the data reflects a varied history of case outcomes. The latest period reflects a return to the long-term average, suggesting that recent decisions remain consistent with the established pattern.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Herring's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Oak Park hearing office
Virginia Herring's most recent office on record is the Oak Park hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves the surrounding region in Michigan and maintains a bench of 19 judges. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 66%, providing context for the local hearing environment. You can see the Oak Park Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Oak Park
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 19 judges whose most recent office on record is the Oak Park office, with 9 of them deciding cases in the latest file. Approval rates among this bench range from 36% to 83% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Virginia Herring has a 51% approval rate since 2016, while the bench at the Oak Park office ranges from 36% to 83%. Because case assignment is random, an attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this hearing office.
The approval rate for Virginia Herring has varied over time, moving from 41% in 2016 to 51% in the most recent partial year of 2026. Understanding these trends is part of how an attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
No, you cannot choose your judge. The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases to judges at the Oak Park office. An attorney can help you prepare your case regardless of which judge is assigned.
A hearing is a formal proceeding where you, your attorney, and often a vocational or medical expert appear before the judge. The judge will ask questions about your work history and medical limitations to determine if you qualify for SSDI benefits. An attorney can help you prepare for these questions.
An approval rate is a statistical summary of past decisions and does not predict the outcome of your specific hearing. The strength of your medical evidence and your testimony are the most important factors in your case. An attorney can help you gather the evidence you need.




