SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael S. Hertzig

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,503 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Michael S. Hertzig are calculated based on 3,503 lifetime decisions. In the most recent reporting period, the judge's 47% approval rate sits alongside an office-wide lifetime range of 24% to 54% for all judges on record at the Metairie office. These figures provide a statistical view of how cases have been decided over time, though they do not predict the outcome of your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 3,503
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Hertzig Metairie National
Approval rate 47% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 34%
Denials 53%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hertzig's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hertzig
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the decision pattern for Michael S. Hertzig has shown fluctuations, moving from a 47% approval rate in the initial year to 59% in 2025, before reaching 47% in the most recent period. This trend indicates that the judge's approach to evidence and case requirements has evolved over the last decade. The latest period reflects a continuation of this pattern, suggesting that the judge remains focused on the specific medical and vocational documentation provided in each file.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hertzig's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Metairie hearing office

The Metairie hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a hub for disability adjudications in Louisiana. The office maintains a bench of 9 judges who handle a diverse caseload of SSDI and SSI claims. You can expect a formal hearing process where the focus remains on the quality of medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Metairie hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges on record at this office since 2016. Across this bench, lifetime approval rates vary significantly, ranging from 24% to 54%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions