SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael S. Hertzig

Last decided MetairieJul 2026
Decisions 3,503since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent data windows. The 44% approval rate for Michael S. Hertzig reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which provides a sample size of 3,503 decisions. When evaluating this against the local bench, the range for judges whose most recent office on record is Metairie is 24% to 54%. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your specific hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 3,503
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Hertzig Metairie National
Approval rate 47% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 34% — —
Denials 53% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hertzig's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hertzig
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Michael S. Hertzig has fluctuated since 2016. While the rate reached 59% in 2025, the latest period shows a rate of 47%. This variation is common in SSDI hearings and often reflects changes in the complexity of cases or the evidence presented. The recent data remains within the established range of the judge's historical record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hertzig's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Metairie hearing office

Michael S. Hertzig's most recent office on record is the Metairie hearing office, which serves you in Louisiana. This office maintains a bench of 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. In the latest reporting period, the office-wide approval rate was 54%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Metairie

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Metairie hearing office. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 24% to 54%. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions