SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. John Heyer

Last decided San FranciscoSep 2018
Decisions 866since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. This judge's 61% approval rate on record since 2016 is evaluated against the 28% to 65% range of the 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the San Francisco hearing office. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how past cases have been decided at this location.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 61%
Decisions on record 866

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Heyer. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Heyer's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Heyer
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for John Heyer was 57% in 2016, 64% in 2017, and 45% in 2018. These 866 total decisions on record since 2016 illustrate a period of activity that shifted over time. The data reflects the outcomes of cases as they were processed during this window, highlighting how case mix and evidence quality can influence outcomes from one year to the next.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Heyer's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Francisco hearing office

The San Francisco hearing office serves you in California and the surrounding region. As of the most recent record in September 2018, this office maintained a bench of 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard administrative process where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary factor in a decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is San Francisco

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 28% to 65% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions