SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Richard Hlaudy

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,672 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. Richard Hlaudy maintains a lifetime approval rate of 58%, which falls within the 46% to 72% range observed among all judges on record at the Fargo hearing office. In the most recent reporting period, his 62% approval rate tracks closely with the office and state averages of 63%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 58%
Decisions on record 3,672
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Hlaudy Fargo National
Approval rate 62% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 51%
Denials 38%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hlaudy's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hlaudy
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The decision record for Richard Hlaudy spans 3,672 decisions since 2016, showing a clear evolution in his approval trends. After a period of lower approval rates between 2019 and 2022, the data shows a notable upward shift starting in 2023, with recent years consistently exceeding the 60% mark. This latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern of higher approval. Understanding these shifts is helpful, though your specific medical evidence remains the most critical factor in your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hlaudy's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fargo hearing office

The Fargo hearing office serves you if you are in North Dakota and the surrounding region. With 7 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 63%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on the documentation of your impairments and work history. You can see the Fargo Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Fargo hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment is essentially random. There are 7 judges on record at this office since 2016, 4 of whom reported decisions in the latest SSA period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 46% to 72% on a lifetime basis. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions