SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Brenda Rosten

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Fargo Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 26,045 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Rosten?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Rosten maintains a 64% lifetime approval rate, which tracks 6 points higher than the national average of 58%. Her recent performance shows a 66% approval rate, keeping her 4 points above the Fargo Hearing Office average of 62%. These figures are derived from 26,045 lifetime decisions.

Metric Judge Rosten Fargo National
Approval rate 64% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 55%
Denials 34%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Rosten's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Rosten
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a decade on the bench, Judge Rosten has demonstrated a consistent approach to disability adjudication. Her approval rates fluctuated between 2021 and 2022, dipping to 56%, before rebounding to 67% in recent years. With 26,045 lifetime decisions, her track record suggests a return to her historical baseline. This recent stability indicates that her current decision-making pattern is well-established within the Fargo Hearing Office environment.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Rosten's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Rosten? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fargo hearing office

The Fargo Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across North Dakota and parts of the surrounding region. It operates with a bench of 6 judges who manage a high volume of disability cases. The office currently maintains an average approval rate of 62%, reflecting regional trends in case outcomes.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Fargo Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 46% to 64%. Because each judge brings a unique perspective to the evidence, your preparation should focus on the specific medical documentation required for your claim.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions