SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Chris Stuber

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Fargo Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 22,965 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Stuber?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your hearing. While the national average approval rate currently sits at 58%, your judge's latest reporting period shows a 61% approval rate. This is measured against a substantial docket of 22,965 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Stuber Fargo National
Approval rate 54% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 56%
Denials 39%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Stuber's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Stuber
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 10-year tenure, your judge has maintained a consistent pattern of decision-making. After an initial period of fluctuation between 2017 and 2021, the approval rate has trended upward, reaching 62% in 2025. This recent performance indicates a shift compared to the lifetime average of 54%. Such patterns often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of medical evidence presented, and the latest period reflects a continuation of this steady upward trend.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Stuber's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Stuber? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fargo hearing office

The Fargo Hearing Office serves claimants throughout North Dakota and surrounding areas. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an active caseload and a latest-period approval rate of 62%. You can expect a professional environment where medical documentation and vocational testimony are prioritized. You can see the Fargo Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Across the Fargo bench, lifetime approval rates for the office's 6 judges range from 46% to 64%. This variance highlights why focusing on the strength of your own medical evidence is the most reliable strategy. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions