SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Ryan Hoback

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Elkins Park Hearing Office · 7 years on the bench · 10,290 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Hoback?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's history to broader benchmarks provides context for your hearing process. Judge Hoback's 49% lifetime approval rate is measured against the Elkins Park Hearing Office latest rate of 60% and the national average of 58%. These figures are drawn from a significant docket of 10,290 lifetime decisions, offering a stable view of historical trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Hoback Elkins Park National
Approval rate 49% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 42%
Denials 51%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hoback's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hoback
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 7-year tenure, your judge's approval rate has shown notable fluctuations. Starting at 42% in 2016, the rate peaked at 56% in 2019 before trending downward. This pattern reflects the evolving nature of the caseload and the specific evidence presented in each hearing. The recent period indicates a departure from the mid-tenure highs, suggesting that case mix and evidentiary standards remain the primary drivers of your final outcome.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hoback's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Hoback? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Elkins Park hearing office

The Elkins Park Hearing Office serves a diverse population across Pennsylvania, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 60%. You should expect a rigorous review of your medical documentation and vocational evidence. You can see the Elkins Park Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. Within the Elkins Park office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 49% to 71%. This variance highlights why thorough preparation is essential regardless of the specific judge assigned to your hearing. You can review the full ALJ roster on the Elkins Park Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions