SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. F. J. Hughes

Last decided Atlanta DowntownSep 2017
Decisions 658since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 51% approval rate for F. J. Hughes reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 23% to 86% range seen among the 22 judges whose most recent office on record is the Atlanta Downtown hearing office during that same period. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how different judges have historically approached disability claims.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 658

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Hughes. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2017. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hughes's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hughes
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for F. J. Hughes has remained steady throughout the available data window, with 51% in 2016 and 50% in 2017. This consistency across 658 decisions on record since 2016 suggests a stable approach to evaluating evidence. Because the record covers a consistent period of time, the data reflects a reliable pattern of decision-making rather than significant fluctuations.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hughes's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Atlanta Downtown hearing office

The Atlanta Downtown hearing office serves you if you are in the region. With 22 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the office manages a diverse caseload of disability claims. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Atlanta Downtown

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and their approval rates vary significantly, ranging from 23% to 86% on their since-2016 records. This variation highlights why understanding the specific bench is helpful for your preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions