SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Gwen Hurley

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2017
Decisions 648 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Gwen Hurley is based on 648 lifetime decisions recorded between 2017 and 2019. When evaluating this figure, consider that the Atlanta Downtown hearing office features a diverse bench with lifetime approval rates spanning from 23% to 86%. This variance highlights the importance of presenting a well-documented case tailored to the requirements of the Social Security Administration. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 43%
Decisions on record 648

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Hurley. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hurley's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hurley
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Gwen Hurley's record shows a consistent approach to disability claims across the 2017-2019 data window. Her approval rate moved from 44% in 2018 to 41% in 2019. With 648 lifetime decisions on record, the data provides a stable view of her historical activity. This trend suggests that her approach to evaluating evidence and medical documentation has remained steady over the observed period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hurley's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Atlanta Downtown hearing office

The Atlanta Downtown hearing office serves you throughout the Georgia region, managing a high volume of disability hearings. The office maintains a bench of 22 judges on record who oversee the adjudication process. You can expect a formal hearing environment where medical evidence and vocational testimony are central to the outcome. You can see the Atlanta Downtown Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Atlanta Downtown hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Gwen Hurley is essentially random. There are 22 judges on record at this office since 2016, with 9 judges currently reporting in the latest SSA data. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 23% to 86% on a lifetime basis. For preparation purposes, the guidance remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions