SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Patricia E. Hurt

Last decided RichmondSep 2016
Decisions 167since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Patricia E. Hurt is based on 167 decisions on record since January 2016. When evaluating this figure, consider the broader bench at the Richmond hearing office, where judges range from 18% to 59% in their approval rates over the same period. These statistics provide a baseline for understanding how different judges approach their dockets.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 34%
Decisions on record 167

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Hurt. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hurt's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hurt
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Patricia E. Hurt is calculated across 167 decisions on record since January 2016. Because case assignment is handled by a workload-balancing algorithm, the specific pattern of a judge is one of many variables that may influence the flow of your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hurt's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Richmond hearing office

Patricia E. Hurt's most recent SSA record (September 2016) is at the Richmond hearing office, which serves you if you are in Virginia. This office maintains a bench of 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can see the Richmond Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Richmond

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Richmond hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 18% to 59% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions