SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. William R. Ingram

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 376 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for William R. Ingram is based on a total of 376 lifetime decisions recorded since 2016. When evaluating this figure, consider that the Memphis hearing office bench features a wide range of approval rates, spanning from 44% to 80% across all judges on record. Comparing these figures helps provide context for the local hearing environment. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 47%
Decisions on record 376

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Ingram. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ingram's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ingram
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The decision pattern for William R. Ingram reflects a consistent approach to disability claims over the recorded period. With 376 lifetime decisions analyzed since 2016, the data indicates a stable trend in how cases are adjudicated. Because the record is focused on this specific window, the approval rate reflects a steady pattern of case review. This consistency allows for a clearer understanding of how evidence is weighed in this courtroom.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ingram's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Memphis hearing office

The Memphis hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a critical hub for SSDI adjudication in Tennessee. The office bench consists of 14 judges who manage a high volume of cases to ensure timely hearings. You can expect a formal proceeding where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary factor in the final decision. You can see the Memphis Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Memphis hearing office currently maintains a bench of 14 judges on record since 2016, with 7 judges reporting in the latest SSA period. Because the SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, you cannot choose your judge, and the assignment process is essentially random. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 44% to 80%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions