SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Davida H. Isaacs

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Lexington Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 20,514 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

In the most recent reporting period, Judge Isaacs maintained an approval rate of 54%, which is 1 percentage point above the Lexington office average and equal to the state average. While this figure trails the national average of 58%, the judge's extensive docket of 20,514 lifetime decisions provides a robust statistical foundation for understanding their approach. These aggregate rates reflect historical trends rather than predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Isaacs Lexington National
Approval rate 53% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 44%
Denials 46%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Isaacs's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Isaacs
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 10-year tenure, your judge's approval rate has fluctuated, ranging from a low of 31% in 2016 to a high of 68% in 2020. Following the 2020 peak, the rate adjusted to 48% in 2021 before stabilizing in the mid-50% range in recent years. This pattern reflects a responsive approach to shifting case volumes and evidence standards, with the latest period continuing this steady, mid-range trend.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Isaacs's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Isaacs? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Lexington hearing office

The Lexington Hearing Office serves you and other claimants throughout Kentucky, managing a high volume of disability cases with a bench of 6 administrative law judges. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 52%, reflecting regional trends in disability adjudication. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical records and vocational history when appearing at this office.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Across the Lexington bench, lifetime approval rates for the 6 ALJs range from 46% to 54%. Because assignment is outside of your control, focusing on the strength and clarity of your medical evidence remains the most effective strategy for your hearing.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions