SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Todd D. Jacobson

Last decided CharlotteSep 2020
Decisions 1,647since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 59% approval rate for Todd D. Jacobson reflects the entire record since 2016, which can be viewed alongside the 29% to 83% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Charlotte. These figures are based on 1,647 decisions on record, providing a clear view of historical trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 59%
Decisions on record 1,647

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Jacobson. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Jacobson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Jacobson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Todd D. Jacobson has remained relatively steady throughout the time on record since 2016. After starting at 56% in 2016, the annual approval rate fluctuated, reaching 63% in 2020. With 1,647 total decisions on record, the data shows a consistent approach to case evaluation.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Jacobson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Charlotte hearing office

The Charlotte hearing office serves you and other claimants across North Carolina and the surrounding region. As of the most recent data, 18 judges have their most recent office on record at this location. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary factor in a decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Charlotte

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is the Charlotte office, with approval rates ranging from 29% to 83% on their since-2016 records. Because each judge has a unique approach to evidence, understanding the broader office bench is helpful.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions