SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Randall D. Huggins

Last decided CharlotteJul 2026
Decisions 3,936since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates provides context on how a judge's recent decisions align with broader trends. Judge Huggins's 85% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, sits above the 71% office average, 65% state average, and 58% national average for the same period. These figures are derived from a docket of 411 decisions during this window, reflecting the judge's recent activity.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Huggins Charlotte National
Approval rate 85% 71% 58%
Fully favorable 78% — —
Denials 15% — —
Decisions 411 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 78%
Decisions on record 3,936

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Huggins's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Huggins
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Judge Huggins has issued 3,936 decisions, maintaining an overall approval rate of 78%. The yearly data shows a trend of rising approval rates between 2022 and 2024, followed by a slight shift in the most recent partial year. While the 85% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, remains high, it sits slightly below the peak levels observed in 2024.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Huggins's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Charlotte hearing office

The Charlotte hearing office serves you across North Carolina and the surrounding region. As of July 2026, this office has 18 judges on record. The office recorded a 71% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Charlotte

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Charlotte hearing office, the 9 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file range from 37% to 89% over the 12-month window. There are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 9 of them having decided cases here in SSA's latest file.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Huggins's 85%. Four of them last decided cases in North Carolina. With too few close matches there, the rest come from SSA's Atlanta region.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Huggins and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions