Randall D. Huggins is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Charlotte Hearing Office with a lifetime approval rate of 78% across 22,777 decisions. This sits above the national average of 58%. While recent data shows a 91% approval rate, these aggregate figures describe past decisions, not predictions for your specific hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Huggins maintains a lifetime approval rate of 78% based on 22,777 decisions. In the most recent reporting period, this rate reached 91%, which is 20 percentage points above the national average of 58% and 6 points above the Charlotte office average. These statistics are derived from a decade of service. Aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Huggins's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over 10 years on the bench, your judge has shown an upward trend in approval rates. While early years saw rates in the high 60s and 70s, the last three years have consistently trended at or above 89%. This recent shift indicates a period of higher allowance frequency compared to the lifetime average. Such patterns often reflect changes in the types of cases heard or evolving standards for evidence.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Huggins's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Huggins? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Charlotte hearing office
The Charlotte Hearing Office serves a large population across North Carolina and the surrounding region. It is staffed by 6 administrative law judges who manage a high volume of disability claims. With an office-wide latest approval rate of 72%, the environment is active and focused on managing the backlog of pending cases.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Charlotte Hearing Office uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Across the office's bench of 6 judges, lifetime approval rates vary, ranging from 28% to 78%. This variance highlights why understanding the general environment of your hearing office is useful. The guidance for your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
