SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Stuart T. Janney

Last decided EvansvilleJul 2026
Decisions 4,072since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Since 2016, Stuart T. Janney has maintained a 49% approval rate across 4,072 decisions, which sits within the 49% to 57% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Evansville Hearing Office. In the most recent reporting period, the judge's approval rate was 51%, compared to an office-wide rate of 55%. These figures reflect historical trends rather than specific outcomes for your case.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 49%
Decisions on record 4,072
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Janney Evansville National
Approval rate 51% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 40% — —
Denials 49% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Janney's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Janney
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Stuart T. Janney has fluctuated since 2016, with yearly figures ranging from a low of 41% in 2019 to a high of 53% in 2018 and 2020. The 4,072 decisions on record indicate a pattern that has remained steady despite these annual variations. While the latest period shows a 51% approval rate, this reflects a continuation of the judge's established decision-making history.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Janney's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Evansville hearing office

The Evansville Hearing Office is the most recent office on record for Stuart T. Janney, with data current through July 2026. This office maintains a bench of 7 judges who handle disability claims. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 55%, providing a benchmark for the local judicial environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Evansville

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is the Evansville Hearing Office, and 6 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 49% to 57% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions