SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael Scurry

Last decided EvansvilleJul 2026
Decisions 4,374since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. The 57% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a long-term view, while latest-period data allows for a current comparison against the Evansville office, Indiana state, and national averages. With 4,374 decisions on record, the data offers a stable look at how this judge has historically handled cases. These figures reflect past activity rather than the outcome of your specific claim.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 4,374
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Scurry Evansville National
Approval rate 59% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 52% — —
Denials 41% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Scurry's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Scurry
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your approval rate for Michael Scurry has fluctuated, moving from 57% in 2016 to 59% in 2026. The most recent data from 2026 shows a 59% approval rate, which is 4 points above the 55% average observed at the Evansville office during the same period. This recent performance reflects the judge's established decision-making patterns over the last decade.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Scurry's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Evansville hearing office

Michael Scurry's most recent office on record is the Evansville hearing office, which serves you in Indiana. This office maintains a bench of 7 judges who handle disability claims. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 55%, providing a regional benchmark for your case.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Evansville

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is the Evansville hearing office, 6 of whom decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates for this bench range from 49% to 57% on their since-2016 records. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions