SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kevin R. Martin

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 4,188 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge's record requires looking at both their long-term history and recent performance. Judge Martin's lifetime approval rate of 57% sits within the 49% to 57% range observed across the Evansville bench. In the most recent reporting period, his 62% approval rate compares to the office-wide 55% rate. These figures reflect historical trends rather than specific outcomes for your hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 4,188
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Martin Evansville National
Approval rate 62% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 52%
Denials 38%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Martin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Martin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Judge Martin has shown movement since 2016. After a period of fluctuation, including a low in 2020, the rate trended upward through 2023 and 2024 before stabilizing in the most recent period. This 4,188-decision record provides a view of how his approach has evolved over the last decade. The latest period reflects a continuation of this pattern, suggesting a consistent application of Social Security Administration guidelines.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Martin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Evansville hearing office

The Evansville hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout Indiana and the surrounding region. With 7 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 55%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. See the Evansville Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is selected randomly. There are 7 judges on record at this office since 2016, 6 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary, with lifetime averages ranging from 49% to 57%. You should prepare your case thoroughly regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions