Carey Jobe is an ALJ at the Chattanooga Hearing Office. Over 5 years on the bench, you will find a lifetime approval rate of 55% across 12,942 decisions. This is 15 percentage points below the Chattanooga office average. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare your case to meet the specific evidentiary standards of this office.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Jobe maintains a 55% lifetime approval rate based on 12,942 total decisions. In the most recent reporting period, this rate sits 15 percentage points below the Chattanooga Hearing Office average and 3 points below the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a look at historical trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Jobe's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over a 5-year tenure, your judge's approval patterns have shown notable shifts. After starting with a 58% approval rate in 2016 and reaching a peak of 63% in 2018, the rate shifted to 49% in 2019 and 42% in 2020. Understanding this trajectory is useful, as it highlights the importance of presenting a well-documented case regardless of historical averages.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Jobe's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Jobe? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Chattanooga hearing office
The Chattanooga Hearing Office serves a broad region of Tennessee, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, it remains a busy hub for SSDI adjudication. You should expect a formal process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can visit the Chattanooga Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to Judge Jobe is essentially random. Across the Chattanooga Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 40% to 75%. This variance underscores that the specific judge assigned to your case can influence the process, though the guidance for your preparation remains consistent.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
