SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Marc Jones

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2018
Decisions 2,203 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Marc Jones reflect a consistent history of decision-making within the San Antonio hearing office. While the judge's lifetime rate is 33%, recent data shows a 31% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 21 points below the office-wide average of 52%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2018
Approval rate 33%
Decisions on record 2,203
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Jones San Antonio National
Approval rate 31% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 25%
Denials 69%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Jones's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Jones
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2018, Marc Jones has presided over 2,203 decisions. The yearly trend shows a period of relative stability, with approval rates fluctuating between 29% and 37% for several years before a recent shift in the latest reporting period. This pattern indicates a judge whose approach to evidence and testimony has remained consistent over the long term. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Jones's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Antonio hearing office

The San Antonio hearing office serves you throughout the region, maintaining a bench of 23 judges on record. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 52%, this location handles a high volume of disability claims. You can expect a formal hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. See the /disability-benefits/hearing-offices/san-antonio-TX Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The San Antonio hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Marc Jones is essentially random. There are 23 judges on record at this office since 2016, 17 of whom reported in the SSA's latest period. Across this bench, lifetime approval rates vary significantly, ranging from 18% to 70%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions