SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Marc Jones

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the San Antonio Hearing Office · 8 years on the bench · 13,154 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Jones has maintained a 32% lifetime approval rate over his 8-year tenure. When compared to the latest reporting period, where the office approval rate stands at 52% and the national average at 58%, his historical data provides a broad view of his decision-making tendencies. These figures are derived from a substantial docket of 13,154 lifetime decisions, offering a stable statistical baseline.

Metric Judge Jones San Antonio National
Approval rate 32% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 42%
Denials 42%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Jones's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Jones
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 8 years on the bench, your judge has seen his approval rates fluctuate. While his lifetime average is 32%, the yearly trend shows a shift from lower rates in the early years to a notable increase in the most recent reporting period. This recent uptick suggests a departure from his long-term historical baseline. Such patterns often reflect changes in the types of cases assigned or evolving evidentiary standards.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Jones's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Jones? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Antonio hearing office

The San Antonio Hearing Office serves a large population across Texas, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 52%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can visit the San Antonio Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Jones is essentially random. Within the San Antonio Hearing Office, the 6 ALJs range from 32% to 51% in their lifetime approval rates. This variation highlights why understanding the local judicial environment is useful for your preparation.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions