SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Ronald T. Jordan

Last decided IndianapolisSep 2020
Decisions 1,816since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent data windows. The 66% approval rate for Ronald T. Jordan reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which compares against the 43% to 75% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Indianapolis. This range provides a clear view of how different judicial approaches can impact outcomes within the same office.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 66%
Decisions on record 1,816

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Jordan. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Jordan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Jordan
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Ronald T. Jordan remained relatively steady throughout the 2016 to 2020 data window. With 1,816 total decisions on record, the judge maintained a consistent approach, starting at 66% in 2016 and ending at 61% in 2020. This stability suggests a predictable decision-making framework over the period analyzed.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Jordan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Indianapolis hearing office

Ronald T. Jordan's most recent office on record is the Indianapolis hearing office, with decisions there through September 2020. This office serves the state of Indiana and is part of a region where caseloads are managed by a bench of 20 judges. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence is the primary factor in your decision. You can see the Indianapolis Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Indianapolis

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 20 judges whose most recent office on record is Indianapolis, with approval rates ranging from 43% to 75% since 2016. Because of this variance, understanding the broader office bench is helpful for your preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions