SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Erin Justice

Last decided DenverJul 2026
Decisions 4,076since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. Erin Justice maintains a 51% approval rate on record since 2016, which sits within the 31% to 75% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Denver hearing office. In the most recent reporting period, the 56% approval rate compares to a 61% rate for the office, a 52% rate for the state, and a 58% national average.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 4,076
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Justice Denver National
Approval rate 56% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 50% — —
Denials 44% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Justice's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Justice
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Erin Justice has fluctuated since 2016, showing a period of lower approval rates between 2018 and 2019 before trending upward in 2022 and 2023. With 4,076 decisions on record, the recent activity shows a 56% approval rate in the latest period. This latest figure reflects a shift from the long-term average, which may be influenced by changes in the types of cases assigned or the evidence presented in recent hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Justice's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Denver hearing office

The Denver hearing office serves you and other claimants across Colorado and the surrounding region. As of the most recent data from July 2026, this office maintains an office-wide approval rate of 61% for the latest period. You can expect a formal hearing process where your evidence and medical documentation are reviewed to determine your eligibility.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Denver

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is the Denver hearing office. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 31% to 75% since 2016. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions