SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Rebecca LaRiccia

Last decided DenverJul 2026
Decisions 3,925since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Rebecca LaRiccia has a 45% approval rate on record since 2016, her latest-period approval rate is 46%. This sits against a broader bench at the Denver hearing office where judge approval rates range from 31% to 75% since 2016. These figures are derived from 3,925 total decisions on record, providing a look at past patterns. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 45%
Decisions on record 3,925
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge LaRiccia Denver National
Approval rate 46% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 35% — —
Denials 54% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge LaRiccia's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge LaRiccia
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Rebecca LaRiccia has fluctuated since 2016. After a period of decline between 2019 and 2021, the data shows a return to more moderate levels in recent years. The latest reporting period shows a 46% approval rate, which remains consistent with her long-term average. This pattern suggests that your judge's recent decisions reflect a continuation of her established approach to case evaluation.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge LaRiccia's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Denver hearing office

Rebecca LaRiccia's most recent office on record is the Denver hearing office, which serves claimants across Colorado and the surrounding region. This office hosts a bench of 22 judges who have recorded decisions since 2016. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 61%, you can expect a rigorous review of your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Denver

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is the Denver hearing office. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 31% to 75% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions