SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Melvyn B. Kalt

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Oak Park Hearing Office · 3 years on the bench · 1,660 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your hearing. Judge Kalt maintains a lifetime approval rate of 64% across 1,660 lifetime decisions. This performance is 8% above the state average and 6% above the national average of 58%. These figures reflect a significant volume of cases, providing a stable data set for review.

Metric Judge Kalt Oak Park National
Approval rate 64% 67% 58%
Fully favorable 54%
Denials 36%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kalt's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kalt
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 3-year tenure, your judge's approval rate has shifted. While early years saw rates of 77% in 2016 and 74% in 2017, the most recent data from 2018 shows an approval rate of 54%. This trend may reflect changes in the types of cases assigned or the specific evidence presented in recent dockets. The current pattern signals a move toward alignment with broader regional averages.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kalt's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Have a hearing with Judge Kalt? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oak Park hearing office

The Oak Park Hearing Office serves a diverse population across Illinois, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 67%. You can expect a formal environment where medical documentation and vocational testimony are prioritized. You can see the Oak Park Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Oak Park Hearing Office, individual lifetime approval rates among the 6 ALJs range from 50% to 80%. This variance highlights that while the office operates under unified federal guidelines, each judge brings a unique approach to evaluating evidence. You can view the full roster of judges at the Oak Park Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions