SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Patricia Kendall

Last decided EvanstonSep 2020
Decisions 1,206since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge's history requires looking at the broader context of their hearing office. The 57% approval rate for Patricia Kendall is based on 1,206 decisions on record since 2016. This figure sits within the 45% to 79% range observed among the 15 judges whose most recent office on record is Evanston. These aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 1,206

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Kendall. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kendall's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kendall
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Patricia Kendall has fluctuated across the data window starting in 2016. After an initial period of stability, the annual approval rate was 61% in 2016, 63% in 2017, 52% in 2018, 57% in 2019, and 48% in 2020. With 1,206 total decisions on record, the data provides a view of these trends over time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kendall's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Evanston hearing office

Patricia Kendall's most recent office on record is the Evanston hearing office, where she recorded decisions through September 2020. This office serves the Illinois region and is part of a larger network of hearing offices managed by the Social Security Administration. With 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office handles a diverse range of disability claims.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Evanston

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is Evanston, with approval rates ranging from 45% to 79% on their since-2016 records. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions