SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Carrie Kerber

Last decided DaytonJul 2026
Decisions 4,252since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure the data remains meaningful. Carrie Kerber's 48% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a baseline, while latest-period figures offer a view of more recent activity. These statistics are derived from 4,252 decisions on record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 48%
Decisions on record 4,252
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Kerber Dayton National
Approval rate 58% 67% 58%
Fully favorable 44% — —
Denials 42% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kerber's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kerber
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since July 2016, your approval rate for Carrie Kerber has shown a varied trajectory. After a period of lower approval rates between 2017 and 2021, the data indicates a gradual upward trend in recent years. The latest reporting period shows an approval rate of 58%, which diverges from the long-term average on record. This recent shift may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality presented in your hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kerber's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Dayton hearing office

Carrie Kerber's most recent office on record is the Dayton hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves you and other claimants across Ohio and maintains a bench of 8 judges. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 67%, reflecting the local environment for disability hearings.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Dayton

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 8 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 5 of them having decided cases here in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 46% to 69% on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions