SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Theodore Kim

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,137 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While the lifetime approval rate for Theodore Kim is 42%, his most recent reporting period shows a 31% approval rate. This latest-period figure sits 32 points below the Washington office average of 63%. These variations are common across the 19 judges on record at this office.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 3,137
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Kim Washington National
Approval rate 31% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 21%
Denials 69%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kim's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kim
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Theodore Kim spans 3,137 decisions since 2016. His approval rate has fluctuated over the years, showing a period of growth between 2022 and 2024 before a recent decline in the latest reporting cycle. This pattern suggests that while he has maintained a consistent baseline, recent outcomes have trended lower than his historical average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kim's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Washington hearing office

The Washington hearing office serves you throughout the District of Columbia and surrounding areas. This office maintains a bench of 19 judges on record, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 63%. You can expect a rigorous review process where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary factor in any decision. You can see the Washington Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is effectively random. There are 19 judges on record at this office since 2016, 14 of whom reported data in the latest period. Lifetime approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 33% to 85%.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions