SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Benjamin Chaykin

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,711 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing Judge Chaykin's performance requires looking at both his long-term record and his most recent activity. His lifetime approval rate of 51% sits within the broader Washington office range of 33% to 85%. In the latest reporting period, his 64% approval rate is 1 percentage point higher than the office average of 63%. These figures are based on 3,711 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 3,711
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Chaykin Washington National
Approval rate 64% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 48%
Denials 36%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Chaykin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Chaykin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Judge Chaykin has maintained a consistent approach to disability claims. While his annual approval rates fluctuated in the early years of this record, the data shows a recent upward trend, reaching 65% in 2026. This latest-period activity diverges from his lifetime average, suggesting a shift in his recent decision-making patterns. The recent uptick marks a distinct phase in his career at the Washington office.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Chaykin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Washington hearing office

The Washington hearing office serves you throughout the District of Columbia and surrounding areas. This office maintains a diverse bench of 19 judges who manage a high volume of disability hearings. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 63%, the facility handles a wide range of medical and vocational evidence. You can see the Washington Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Chaykin is essentially random. There are 19 judges on record at this office since 2016, 14 of whom reported data in the latest period. Because approval rates across this bench vary significantly—ranging from 33% to 85%—understanding the office environment is helpful. You can find more information on the Washington hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions