SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. William M. Manico

On record 3,149 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for William M. Manico reflect a significant body of work, with 3,149 decisions analyzed since 2016. When comparing his latest-period performance to the broader Baltimore office, he maintains a rate of 73%, which is 13 points higher than the office average of 60%. These figures offer a statistical baseline for understanding his decision-making history.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 68%
Decisions on record 3,149
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Manico Baltimore National
Approval rate 73% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 68%
Denials 27%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Manico's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Manico
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The yearly trend for William M. Manico shows a shift toward higher approval rates in recent years. After starting with a 60% rate in 2016, his decisions have trended upward, reaching 84% in 2025. This pattern suggests a consistent approach to evaluating evidence over the last decade.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Manico's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Baltimore hearing office

The Baltimore hearing office serves you throughout Maryland and the surrounding region. With a bench of 26 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 60%. You can expect a formal process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases to judges through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. There are 26 judges on record at this office since 2016, with 10 currently reporting in the latest period. The lifetime approval rates across this bench range from 32% to 79%, highlighting the variance you might encounter.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions