SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. William M. Manico

Last decided BaltimoreJul 2026
Decisions 3,149since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, William M. Manico's 77% approval rate compares to the Baltimore office rate of 60%, the Maryland state rate of 56%, and the national average of 58%. These figures are based on 75 decisions.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Manico Baltimore National
Approval rate 77% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 61% — —
Denials 23% — —
Decisions 75 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 68%
Decisions on record 3,149

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Judge Manico made fewer than 100 decisions in the last 12 months, too few for a fair side-by-side, so the judge comparison tool leaves them out.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Manico's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Manico
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, William M. Manico has issued 3,149 decisions with an overall approval rate of 68%. Yearly approval rates were 60% in 2016, 53% in 2017, 61% in 2018, 64% in 2019, 66% in 2020, 80% in 2021, 79% in 2022, 89% in 2023, 83% in 2024, 84% in 2025, and 73% in the partial 2026 fiscal year.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Manico's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Baltimore hearing office

The Baltimore office is the most recent office on record for William M. Manico, with activity logged through July 2026. The office recorded a 60% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Baltimore

The 8 judges who decided cases at the Baltimore office in SSA's latest file range from 41% to 77% in approval rates over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. This range reflects the activity of the current bench.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions