SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. William M. Manico

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Nhc Falls Church Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 20,019 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Manico?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks helps you understand the landscape of your hearing. Judge Manico's 69% lifetime approval rate stands in contrast to the current 51% approval rate at the NHC Falls Church office and the 58% national average. With 20,019 decisions on record, this data provides a stable view of past judicial activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Manico Nhc Falls Church National
Approval rate 69% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 66%
Denials 12%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Manico's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Manico
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a decade on the bench, Judge Manico has seen a notable shift in approval trends. While early years showed rates in the 50% to 60% range, recent data indicates a steady rise, with the latest reporting period reaching an 88% approval rate. This trajectory suggests a significant evolution in how cases are evaluated at this bench. The current pattern reflects a sustained increase compared to the long-term lifetime average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Manico's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Manico? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Nhc Falls Church hearing office

The NHC Falls Church hearing office serves a wide population across Virginia, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 51% during the latest reporting period. You should be prepared for a rigorous review of your medical evidence and vocational history. See the NHC Falls Church Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is selected randomly. Within the NHC Falls Church office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 48% to 69%. Because assignment is outside of your control, understanding the office-wide environment is as important as researching your specific judge. You can find more information on the hearing office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions