SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kristen King

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Cincinnati Hearing Office · 8 years on the bench · 10,985 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge King?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge King maintains a lifetime approval rate of 65% based on 10,985 lifetime decisions. In the most recent reporting period, this rate sits 9 points higher than the Cincinnati Hearing Office average and 7 points above the national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical look at past performance, though they do not guarantee a specific outcome for your hearing.

Metric Judge King Cincinnati National
Approval rate 65% 56% 58%
Fully favorable 55%
Denials 35%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge King's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge King
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY23
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 8 years on the bench, Judge King has seen a notable shift in approval trends. While early years showed rates near 49%, recent data indicates an upward trend, reaching 91% in the most recent reporting year. This trajectory reflects a move away from the lifetime average of 65% in favor of higher allowance rates. The recent uptick may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality presented at your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge King's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge King? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Cincinnati hearing office

The Cincinnati Hearing Office serves a large population across Ohio, managing a high volume of disability claims. With 6 judges on the bench, the office maintains an average approval rate of 56%. You can expect a formal process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can visit the Cincinnati Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Across the 6 judges at the Cincinnati Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates range from 37% to 73%. Because of this variance, understanding the local bench is helpful for setting expectations.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions