SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Ward D. King

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Fort Worth Hearing Office · 4 years on the bench · 9,166 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge King has maintained a lifetime approval rate of 36% based on 9,166 decisions. Compared to the latest reporting period, the judge's approval rate is 19 points below the Fort Worth Hearing Office average and 22 points below the national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical baseline for the judge's history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge King Fort Worth National
Approval rate 36% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 31%
Denials 64%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge King's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge King
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 4-year tenure, the approval rate for Judge King has shown an upward trend. Starting at 33% in 2016, the rate rose to 42% by 2019. This trajectory indicates that the judge's decision-making pattern has evolved, with recent data reflecting a higher allowance frequency than the lifetime average. This shift may reflect changes in case mix or the quality of evidence presented in recent years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge King's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge King? A free benefit check tells you if you qualify.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fort Worth hearing office

The Fort Worth Hearing Office serves a significant population in Texas, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office operates under standard SSA guidelines for administrative hearings. You can expect a formal environment where the focus remains on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can visit the Fort Worth Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Within the Fort Worth Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 30% to 51%. Because this variance exists, you should focus on the strength of your medical evidence regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions